yandex

Sir Creek Water Dispute Bridging Gaps for Lasting Indo-Pak Diplomacy

  • Sir Creek Water Dispute Bridging Gaps for Lasting Indo-Pak Diplomacy

Sir creek's issue is a water dispute with Pakistan and India at Rann of Kutch, which is 60 miles long. It flows through the Arabian Sea. It separates the Kutch region in India and the Gujarat Sindh region in Pakistan. It lies close to 23 58N, 68 48E. Sir Creek was requested to resolve the conflict between the rulers from Sindh and the Rao of Kutch. Kutch was part of Sindh before the separation from India afterwards. It was part of the Bombay presidency. The resolution defines the boundaries of two territories, a portion of the Creek portion of Sindh and the boundary east of the eastern end of the Creek. The boundary line is referred to by the name "Green Line" and is disputed by India, have created the "Indicative Line", also known in the form of "ribbon Line" technical language. The Green line announced by Pakistan and the Red line declared in India, along with the Black lines, are an undisputed part.

India is arguing in support of the calling the Thalweg Doctrine. The law states that a river may be divided from its mid-channel if two nations agree on the division. Pakistan opposes the laws insisting that the law isn't valid because Sir Creek is not navigable; however, it does respect the 1925 map. India asserts Sir Creek can be navigable even in high-tied conditions, and fishermen use it to travel to open waters. Pakistan is not a party to the Thalweg Doctrine of international law since she must give away thousands of km of land. The region played a role in the Indo-Pak war of 1965 due to a Skirmish being fought between two countries in April 1965; however, in the same year, a tribunal was set up to settle the matter due to the conflict. British Prime Minister Harold Wilson, in a verdict, Pakistan received the equivalent of 35 square miles as territory, yet Indian military's MiG 21 short naval air arm BreguetAtlantique patrol plane, in the Atlantic area of Sir Creek 10 th August 1999.

The zone isn't significant in terms of military importance. However, it is precious because of its resources for economic development, such as gas and oil lines beneath the ocean's surface, and is among the only economic zones. There have been numerous attempts to resolve the issue, but they have not succeeded since 1969. The dispute focuses on administrative delimitation, allocation and demarcation. Each side was able to propose its form of solution. However, the other side had to side rejected it in writing. Idea.

The matter is still a lingering issue and is viewed as one of the many unresolved disputes that have caused conflict and discord between India and Pakistan. It's not as prominent in the same way as Kashmir, but it does contribute to the tension between the two countries. While numerous efforts were made to figure out a solution, each failed. All that is required is a determination to make a political decision so that a compromise can be searched for. The rigid and rigid views are to be replaced by the desire to create well-being and happiness in the lives of residents of the region. A better future is achievable only through the removal of the existing obstacles to the elimination of the seeds of hatred and aggressiveness. A quick solution to Sir Creek can prove highly useful in taking the dialogue that was restarted and making it more productive if we start with Sir Creek and see how a moral booster will help eliminate the trust gap in bilateral relations between the two nations.

To close the discussion, Sir Creek is one of India's and Pakistan's many disputes. While it's small in scale, it's enormous in terms of the possibility of an unfortunate event leading to conflict. Both governments must prevent any unfortunate event, which can only be prevented when the issue is eliminated. Its resolution helps settle disputes, thus ushering in the dawn of peace throughout the region. The current events are moving in a lighter direction. The Stalwarts of New Delhi and Islamabad have realised the change in the situation. Both cities can live peacefully and solve any issues through talks and dialogue. This is in the best good interest of all.